05

Verify

Put screening, monitoring, and escalation around the money flow.

A risk score only becomes a control when policy, ownership, investigation, and evidence are defined.

First questionWhat event should stop, escalate, or reject a transaction?
A compliance professional reviewing a documented digital payment risk workflow.

Decision signals

When this path deserves investigation.

  1. 01

    The business controls or facilitates customer or counterparty flows.

  2. 02

    Wallet and transaction risk must be evaluated.

  3. 03

    Compliance teams can own alerts and case outcomes.

  4. 04

    Legal analysis has defined the applicable obligations.

Operating stack

Four layers that must agree.

A provider can cover several layers, but the business still needs an owner and evidence for each one.

01

Identity

Customer, business, and beneficiary verification

02

Screen

Wallet, sanctions, exposure, and counterparty checks

03

Monitor

Transaction behavior, rules, alerts, and thresholds

04

Resolve

Investigation, escalation, reporting, and retention

Risk register starter

What could make the flow fail?

Use these as investigation prompts. They are not a complete legal, security, accounting, or compliance assessment.

Provider starting set

Different operating models, not a ranked list.

Run the Stack Finder →
Compliance & riskSource checked

Chainalysis

Blockchain data and risk tooling for financial institutions, crypto businesses, governments, and compliance teams.

Compliance & riskSource checked

TRM Labs

Blockchain intelligence and compliance tooling focused on detecting illicit finance and managing on-chain risk.

Treasury & custodySource checked

Fireblocks

Enterprise infrastructure for wallets, treasury operations, stablecoin payments, security policy, and custody connections.

Build the brief

Research before the demo.